Ducati DesertX Forum banner

A Post I Hoped I Wouldn't Be Making - Sold the DDX

1820 Views 13 Replies 8 Participants Last post by  Bking
I just sold the DDX. Luckily with people waiting on one, I was able to get "list price" for it. Sure I still lost some money on Tax, Reg, and Set-up.

Why did I sell it? In a nutshell, it just didn't work for me. Specifics and back history below.

If you look back to one of my first posts, I stated I already owned a KTM 890 Adventure. I'd sell which one didn't work for me, the DDX or the KTM. Unfortunately, the DDX doesn't work for me. I say unfortunate, as I'm a long time Ducatista. I've owned Ducatis since 2002. In that time owning a total of 3 Multistradas (First Gen, 1260 Enduro, Multi V4S travel and radar). As well as all manner of their Sportbikes and Nakeds). So I'm no Ducati-hater or first time Ducati Owner. Nor am I a first time ADV'er. Since I started riding ADV bikes some 10 years ago, I've owned 10 different ADV bikes. So I'm not new to ADV bikes. I say all the above as I know some are thinking that I'm a KTM fanboy (My 890 is the first KTM I've ever owned), or that I don't know Ducatis or I'm new to ADVs and don't know what I'm taking about.

Let's be clear. I'm not saying the DDX is a bad bike, I just doesn't work for me.

What I didn't like about the DDX (Again, my perspective, YMMV)
  • Handling. Everyone said how amazing on-road the DDX handled with a 21" front tire. For me even with the suspension settings adjust as much as they could be given the lack of range of adjustments, I couldn't get enough weight on the front tire. So, for me, the front-end was vague, and somewhat mushy when in the canyons. Never felt connected to the road. Very disappointed with this as just about every other Ducati I'v owned has ALWAYS handled amazing. The one other Ducati that didn't handle well was the first gen Multistrada.
    • My KTM also has a 21" front tire and it rides like it's on rails in the canyons and also handles excellent off-road
  • Off-road maneuverability. With the longer wheel-base it's not as maneuverable in slow tight technical spaces. With the longer wheel base the rear tends to come around a little slower and tighter. At a reasonable pace it's good with the exception of the suspension (mostly the rear).
  • Suspension - The rear shock is WAY undersprung. As I stated in another post even without the rider, setting preload with just the bikes weight has the preload knob at max. Suspension with just the bike uses close to the 30% which should be with rider onboard. Given this once you add bags and gear the suspension is not going to give you the preload you need. I know some people say they have no problems with the rear shock, but seriously, do some research from some of the top-notch suspension gurus and you'll see the shock is also undersprung. I raced for many years and that lack of preload doesn't put enough weight on the front end causing the vague feel.
  • Bar position and height - Agreed this is PURELY personal preference. There was something about the bar height and width that didn't work for me. I don't know if it was my reach to the bars especially when standing and on a steep climb. Felt too close to me that I could lean on them to add weight to the front end. If everything else worked for me. I'd have played with the bike in this area.
  • Lastly Buffeting - Again, I agree purely based on the rider. I could never get the buffeting to even be tolerable at highway speeds. I ride 50/50 and that 50% onroad is just trying to get to good offroad places. I also went over this in a separate thread. I tried the WRS Enduro windscreen, Ducati Touring screen and even mounted those wings on top of the windscreen with only minimal changes or benefit. I even tried different helmets, Peak, no Peak, round shape like Arai, Shoei Neotec II, Roadracing helmets, with no clear benefit. I'm not tall either. I'm just under 6' tall (I'm actually shorter but I have a long torso which puts my affective height at 6' when seated).

So in the end, my KTM 890 does everything I want from a mid-weight ADV bike. Again, no hate on the DDX, it just didn't work for me.
See less See more
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 2
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
That's interesting to hear. I ride mine in very technical single track and don't perceive the points you mentioned above, but that could be that I'm less experienced and still don't have the sensitivity to detect these things.

Well, sad to hear you didn't have a happy experience with the DDX and happy riding with your new horse!
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I respect your review. The KTM 890 was high on my list too as i have a 690 enduro that now has 23,000kms on it and other than a burnt out horn there have been no problems. I do realize the 890 will be the better of the two machines in the dirt. (Lower weight, better suspension ) One of the number of reasons i went with the Desert X was the spotty reliability on the 890. In my group of adventure riders I know of four 790/890 owners who have had valve and camshaft problems with them. I intend on keeping the Ducati for many many years. If i need to put a fork kit and a heavier rear spring, or even an Ohlin shock I would have no problem with that. One thing I noticed is that there are numerous manufacturers quickly adding aftermarket parts and refinements to Desert X owners. Hope your 890 works out for you and gives you many trouble free miles.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Thanks for the kind responses. I'm still going to stay on this forum as I'd like to see how things develop with the DDX.

Just for clarity, I did not buy an KTM 890 to replace the DDX. I already had the 890. Sticking with the 890 does make me a bit nervous as the issues you mention @Carlito are real. I too know a couple people first hand who have had major failures with their 790s. In one case the guy had to pay for the repairs out of his pocket and it was at huge cost.

I've not heard of as many or frequent problems with the 890 so I'm hoping that'll be the case.

I do not currently have a plans to buy anything else. I'd like to try the Tenere 700 but from what I've read it feels top heavy due to fuel placement. So I'll just ride my 890 and see what develops next.
Thanks for the kind responses. I'm still going to stay on this forum as I'd like to see how things develop with the DDX.

Just for clarity, I did not buy an KTM 890 to replace the DDX. I already had the 890. Sticking with the 890 does make me a bit nervous as the issues you mention @Carlito are real. I too know a couple people first hand who have had major failures with their 790s. In one case the guy had to pay for the repairs out of his pocket and it was at huge cost.

I've not heard of as many or frequent problems with the 890 so I'm hoping that'll be the case.

I do not currently have a plans to buy anything else. I'd like to try the Tenere 700 but from what I've read it feels top heavy due to fuel placement. So I'll just ride my 890 and see what develops next.
Just wondering DicatiBart if you tried a different tire on the front of your Desert X ?, or did you just run the stock tires. I have had no experience with them, but they don't look the best for the offroad conditions I will be seeing in Britsh Columbia. A set of Motoz Tractionators currently sitting under my work bench.
No I did not change out the tires. I'd run STRs on a 1260 Multistrada and a V4S Multistrada. While not the best tire, they were not the worst either. Good for like 80/20 riding. Good in the wet as well They were fine offroad. The only place I'd wish for something different was in sand or really loose dirt where deeper lugs would have been better.

Personally, for big ADV bikes, my personal choice are Karoo 3s. I've yet to try the 4s. I've run Mitas E07s. I loved how long they lasted but I found they took about 200 miles to break in and were horrible in wet weather. So it's Karoos for 50/50 riding and TKC80s for more demanding terrain.

Just wondering DicatiBart if you tried a different tire on the front of your Desert X ?, or did you just run the stock tires. I have had no experience with them, but they don't look the best for the offroad conditions I will be seeing in Britsh Columbia. A set of Motoz Tractionators currently sitting under my work bench.
I just sold the DDX. Luckily with people waiting on one, I was able to get "list price" for it. Sure I still lost some money on Tax, Reg, and Set-up.

Why did I sell it? In a nutshell, it just didn't work for me. Specifics and back history below.

If you look back to one of my first posts, I stated I already owned a KTM 890 Adventure. I'd sell which one didn't work for me, the DDX or the KTM. Unfortunately, the DDX doesn't work for me. I say unfortunate, as I'm a long time Ducatista. I've owned Ducatis since 2002. In that time owning a total of 3 Multistradas (First Gen, 1260 Enduro, Multi V4S travel and radar). As well as all manner of their Sportbikes and Nakeds). So I'm no Ducati-hater or first time Ducati Owner. Nor am I a first time ADV'er. Since I started riding ADV bikes some 10 years ago, I've owned 10 different ADV bikes. So I'm not new to ADV bikes. I say all the above as I know some are thinking that I'm a KTM fanboy (My 890 is the first KTM I've ever owned), or that I don't know Ducatis or I'm new to ADVs and don't know what I'm taking about.

Let's be clear. I'm not saying the DDX is a bad bike, I just doesn't work for me.

What I didn't like about the DDX (Again, my perspective, YMMV)
  • Handling. Everyone said how amazing on-road the DDX handled with a 21" front tire. For me even with the suspension settings adjust as much as they could be given the lack of range of adjustments, I couldn't get enough weight on the front tire. So, for me, the front-end was vague, and somewhat mushy when in the canyons. Never felt connected to the road. Very disappointed with this as just about every other Ducati I'v owned has ALWAYS handled amazing. The one other Ducati that didn't handle well was the first gen Multistrada.
    • My KTM also has a 21" front tire and it rides like it's on rails in the canyons and also handles excellent off-road
  • Off-road maneuverability. With the longer wheel-base it's not as maneuverable in slow tight technical spaces. With the longer wheel base the rear tends to come around a little slower and tighter. At a reasonable pace it's good with the exception of the suspension (mostly the rear).
  • Suspension - The rear shock is WAY undersprung. As I stated in another post even without the rider, setting preload with just the bikes weight has the preload knob at max. Suspension with just the bike uses close to the 30% which should be with rider onboard. Given this once you add bags and gear the suspension is not going to give you the preload you need. I know some people say they have no problems with the rear shock, but seriously, do some research from some of the top-notch suspension gurus and you'll see the shock is also undersprung. I raced for many years and that lack of preload doesn't put enough weight on the front end causing the vague feel.
  • Bar position and height - Agreed this is PURELY personal preference. There was something about the bar height and width that didn't work for me. I don't know if it was my reach to the bars especially when standing and on a steep climb. Felt too close to me that I could lean on them to add weight to the front end. If everything else worked for me. I'd have played with the bike in this area.
  • Lastly Buffeting - Again, I agree purely based on the rider. I could never get the buffeting to even be tolerable at highway speeds. I ride 50/50 and that 50% onroad is just trying to get to good offroad places. I also went over this in a separate thread. I tried the WRS Enduro windscreen, Ducati Touring screen and even mounted those wings on top of the windscreen with only minimal changes or benefit. I even tried different helmets, Peak, no Peak, round shape like Arai, Shoei Neotec II, Roadracing helmets, with no clear benefit. I'm not tall either. I'm just under 6' tall (I'm actually shorter but I have a long torso which puts my affective height at 6' when seated).

So in the end, my KTM 890 does everything I want from a mid-weight ADV bike. Again, no hate on the DDX, it just didn't work for me.
Very interesting. Thanks for posting thisthough we don’t want to hear it. Lol.
Very interested to hear your experienced suspension facts.
I hope to address handling with a top notch suspension specialist who I trust. ($850-1000) Also moulded earplugs made up ($100) and possibly a super short screen for the buffeting. Operating use will probably be the exact opposite of you where I hope to do simple country roads, with the occasional good dirt gravel to get between those locations, hard-core riding, should be rare or use my enduro FE450.
Bar and height rider positioning i carefully tested in my 40 min test ride and I’m hopeful it will be good for me.
yes sport riding will not be be as good as my last Dukes., however, I think it will be better on road than the other comparable adventure bikes that I have ridden which is what I’m hoping for.
.
I think the handling issues I listed can be solved with proper suspension tuning. The first place to start is the rear shock. Get that thing properly set-up for the correct preload and go from there. Once that is sorted then the forks would be next. Can't tell how much fork work is needed until the rear is properly set up as it WILL put more weight on the front end.

With more weight on the front-end, I believe it will be more precise and lose that vagueness. Since you are doing mostly roads, I think you may be able to get away with just having the shock resprung, at least to start.

Regarding Screens, for me it wasn't the wind noise. It was the buffeting. Literally it was as if someone was holding and shaking my helmet above 55 mph. I already have some light-headedness from some of the meds I take. Again, not looking for "clean" air but less buffeting. I don't know why I couldn't find a "okay" solution. And it seem alot of people have/had zero issues. Odd as I'm of avg height.

Regarding riding position. I think for riding seated and most non-technical dirt roads, the stock bars and height are fine. I found it comfortable. It's off-road when it get's technical and steep. I'm sure given some time I'd have been able to figure out a good alternative or aftermarket bar.

I didn't expect the DDX to handle like my Streetfighter or Panigale (sold), but every Ducati I've ever owned including the Hyperstrada and even the Diavel, had really good precise handling. So a bit of shocker to me how vague the DDX was.

Now I know I could have fixed these issues, well with the exception of the buffeting until some one comes out with a laminar flow windshield. But I already had my KTM 890 which does everything well. So I didn't feel like spending more money on the DDX.






Very interesting. Thanks for posting thisthough we don’t want to hear it. Lol.
Very interested to hear your experienced suspension facts.
I hope to address handling with a top notch suspension specialist who I trust. ($850-1000) Also moulded earplugs made up ($100) and possibly a super short screen for the buffeting. Operating use will probably be the exact opposite of you where I hope to do simple country roads, with the occasional good dirt gravel to get between those locations, hard-core riding, should be rare or use my enduro FE450.
Bar and height rider positioning i carefully tested in my 40 min test ride and I’m hopeful it will be good for me.
yes sport riding will not be be as good as my last Dukes., however, I think it will be better on road than the other comparable adventure bikes that I have ridden which is what I’m hoping for.
.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Well first off with any bike wether road or offroad you get springs to suit your weight then get suspension set up by someone who knows what they are doing, secondly if you want more weight on to the front tyre you raise the forks through the triple clamps and also add more pre load to the rear, if you want to shorten wheel bast then raise forks through triple clamps or take a link out of the chain and move rear spindle forward, not really rocket science, any suspension guy would tell any rider to get springs to match the riders weight, I've done this on 200 bhp superbikes to mx bikes to my current enduro and supermoto bikes
I agree with some of what you say. Suspension tuning isn't black and white. And one size does not fit all. You over-simplify some of your explanations. Cause if it truly that easy there wouldn't be a need for suspension tuning and tuners.

I don't necessarily agree with your statement about "get springs to suit your weight", IF the stock springs are capable of being adjusted to riders weight. I would say; "Ensure your stock springs match your (correct) weight and if not, THEN get springs. While the DDX is a case where the rear shock is way undersprung and is wrong for any rider. However depending the rider's weight the stock suspension springs on some bikes may be good enough. I've seen that with some higher end WP and Ohlins suspensions or riders in the 150-190lb arena

The first thing to do when setting up your suspension is the preload for the rear shock. It's pointless to play with fork height in the triples cause if you don't have the proper rear preload to start, your rake and trail aren't going to be optimal for you. Once you have the rear shock's preload set correctly whether it's with the stock spring, heavier spring, or different shock, then you can work on the other suspension aspects. Any suspension shop worth their salt will first see if the stock suspension is workable before selling you springs.

Regarding lowering or raising forks. First and foremost the reason for doing this is to change the rake and trail. Adding or removing weight from the front end is secondary. Changing Rake and Trail can slow down steering or speed it up.

I've been riding and roadracing for over 40 years I even won some races. I worked at shops when I was younger and even did trackside support to include suspension set-up. And while it may not be "rocket science" it's not "do this and it will solve this problem" Suspension is not set and forget. It's requires fine tuning and that can even be from track to track... Don't believe me, watch Dave Moss and how he "works" with people to get it right for them...

Well first off with any bike wether road or offroad you get springs to suit your weight then get suspension set up by someone who knows what they are doing, secondly if you want more weight on to the front tyre you raise the forks through the triple clamps and also add more pre load to the rear, if you want to shorten wheel bast then raise forks through triple clamps or take a link out of the chain and move rear spindle forward, not really rocket science, any suspension guy would tell any rider to get springs to match the riders weight, I've done this on 200 bhp superbikes to mx bikes to my current enduro and supermoto bikes
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I respect your review. The KTM 890 was high on my list too as i have a 690 enduro that now has 23,000kms on it and other than a burnt out horn there have been no problems. I do realize the 890 will be the better of the two machines in the dirt. (Lower weight, better suspension ) One of the number of reasons i went with the Desert X was the spotty reliability on the 890. In my group of adventure riders I know of four 790/890 owners who have had valve and camshaft problems with them. I intend on keeping the Ducati for many many years. If i need to put a fork kit and a heavier rear spring, or even an Ohlin shock I would have no problem with that. One thing I noticed is that there are numerous manufacturers quickly adding aftermarket parts and refinements to Desert X owners. Hope your 890 works out for you and gives you many trouble free miles.
Teething stages of a first year (and some change) bike to be sure. I would be surprised if there was ever a first year bike that touched all the bases. Indeed the DDX came close for me out of the box. But I would also bet that Ducati is taking notes from rider experiences on forums like these to upgrade the bikes to follow. I've been impressed with the mods I've made to address the concerns I've had with the DDX and suspension is definitely next up as I'm a large guy and need the shock resprung for my size + luggage. Having owned KTM ADV bikes in the past (640, 950), I passed on the KTM 890 soley on the basis that I wanted more comfort over longer distances in a true 50/50 sense and I figured if I wanted to do a lot of technical off road I'd look at maybe getting a dedicated dirt bike. I know that's not an option for everyone though.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I have had this experience with a few bikes over the years as well, there certainly is no one size fits all, which in my opinion is a good thing and why we have such great options to choose from these days, and I am sure more to come. Two of the items, as you noted, are very rider specific, positioning and buffeting, and at 5'7" and 160 pounds the bike fits pretty good and no buffeting at all (same fit almost as my 890R after a handlebar change). My 2023 DX I just got last week has about the proper static sag and I can get my rider sag damn close, almost as good as I was my 890R stock (perfect after improvement). I loved that 890, but I did send the suspension out to SP here in AZ and it was a world of difference. I am sure the DX will end up there or at the ride shop eventually as well, it has some harsh spots thru the stroke for sure, and yes, more work is needed in the rear thank the front. Like you said, that matters a lot for the riding we will do on these things. For me the jury is still out, way too new here to tell, but I have the exact opposite experience in the canyons so far at 600 miles, the KTM was so vague and scary under heavy acceleration until I added the Scotts stabilizer, then it was on rails as you said. I had been stranded a few times on that bike, immobilizer failure, valves were at 0 tolerance at 8000 miles so the bike would not start (200 mile tow home out of the desert, no Bueno) and the constant cold starting trouble that was just draining batteries all the time made me uneasy. So I traded it after 14K miles. When that bike was going it was great, but it had some moments I just wasn't sure I would make it home at times. Which to be fair, only once did I need the tow and that could happen to any bike for sure, even this DX. I would buy another KTM for sure, I have a 2022 Husky TE150i so definitely I don't hate the Austrians or hold a grudge, LOL.

Oddly I find the DX to 'feel' lighter on the trail than the KTM (which it certainly is not physically lighter), but again, I think a lot of that 'feel' stuff is subjective and will depend on so many factors like height, weight, luggage, terrain, level of exhaustion for the day, physical fitness and experience, etc. I think we are all winners so long as these companies remain competitive with each other and we can get out there and have a great time beating the crap out of these machines and ourselves! We are all blessed to even be having these discussions about what we like better about these $20K bikes, we are all very fortunate indeed.

Hope to see you all out there on whatever bike you like! If anyone is passing thru AZ look me up and lets go ride!
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I just sold my DDX too.

I have a few adventure bikes, my main ride has been a KTM 890 R. I bought the Ducati to compare, took it on a 2,100 mile trip, then have been switching back and forth with the KTM. I decided the Ducati just doesn't do it for me.

Wind noise and helmet buffeting are much worse on the Ducati, and I'm running much more aggressive knobbies on the KTM (Goldentyre 723s.) The seat to footpeg feels more cramped on the Ducati, though the measurement is the same as my KTM (I'm 5'-9" with 30" inseam fwiw.) I haven't really explored the geometry of the triangle, but I'm sure there are aftermarket parts that can improve that. The scoop of the seat also really limited moving around on the bike, though again a taller, flatter seat could help for sure. The Ducati consistently gets 10mpg or more worse than the KTM, though the bikes have similar power.

The killer issue for me was off-road manners. I had stock tires on the DDX, but I'm not talking about traction problems. The off-road electronics were impressive on the Ducati, they felt similar to KTM. The Ducati makes much less torque at low revs, so I found myself fighting stalls much more frequently. A Rekluse clutch would probably really help if they made them for the DDX. One exercise I practice is slower-than-first-gear figure eights, standing and sitting as slow and tight as I can manage. The Ducati was really tough to wrestle, and it would be a nightmare on logging road switchbacks that are pretty typical near me. I tried multiple electronics programs to see how the maps changed but the bike just doesn't lug well at all.

I was also concerned about how the bike would crash. I really don't like bolting steel crash bars to a bike, they make wrenching a pain and are pointless weight and expense. That said they're basically required on the DDX with a metal tank, water pump hanging out there, etc. I'm more comfortable with plastic tanks and engines tucked in to crash better. I drop bikes regularly off-road and with the KTM that just isn't a worry.

In the end I'm glad I spent the time and money to really compare the bikes for my use and I will do it again if Ducati makes some changes with a future iteration. I'm really glad Ducati is entering the midweight off-road travel market, we need more manufacturers to take good shots at it and push the whole market forward. One thing this exercise convinced me to do is to install good Brembo calipers and master cylinder on my KTM.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
Top